What is Credential Stuffing?

Credential stuffing is a cyberattack where attackers use stolen usernames and passwords from one data breach to gain unauthorized access to user accounts on other websites. Attackers automate this process, testing massive lists of credentials against a target’s login page, exploiting the common human habit of password reuse across multiple services.

Unlike a targeted hack, credential stuffing is a game of scale and probability. It operates on the simple, unfortunate truth that millions of people use the same email and password combination for their banking, social media, and online shopping accounts. When one of these services suffers a data breach, that list of credentials becomes a key that attackers can use to try and unlock countless other doors across the internet.

The rise of credential stuffing is directly linked to the proliferation of large-scale data breaches over the past decade. Every time a major company announces a breach, millions or even billions of username and password pairs, known as “combo lists”, become available to cybercriminals. These lists are bought, sold, and traded on dark web marketplaces, providing an endless supply of ammunition for these attacks.

This type of attack is not about guessing a password. It is about validating known, previously stolen credentials against a new target. Because the username and password pair is already correct for at least one service, the success rate is significantly higher than traditional brute-force attacks, which try to guess passwords for a single account.

The Technical Mechanics of a Credential Stuffing Attack

A credential stuffing attack is not a single action but a methodical, automated process. It relies on specialized software and a clear, multi-step strategy to compromise user accounts at an industrial scale. Understanding this process reveals why it is both so effective for attackers and so challenging for businesses to defend against.

The first step for any attacker is acquiring the raw material: stolen credentials. These are sourced from countless data breaches and aggregated into massive text files called combo lists. Each line in the file contains a potential username (often an email address) and a password, separated by a colon or comma.

These lists can contain millions or even billions of entries. They are readily available on dark web forums and illicit marketplaces, often for very low prices. The sheer volume of available credentials is what makes the entire attack model economically viable for criminals.

Next, the attacker chooses a target. High-value websites are top priorities, such as e-commerce stores with saved credit cards, financial services with direct access to funds, or gaming platforms with valuable digital assets. Any service where a user account holds intrinsic or monetary value is a prime candidate.

With a combo list and a target in hand, the attacker deploys an automation tool. Software like Sentry MBA, OpenBullet, or custom-coded scripts are designed to handle the attack. This software acts as the engine, capable of making thousands of login requests per minute.

A critical component of the attack is evasion. If a bot sent thousands of login requests from a single IP address, it would be instantly blocked by a simple firewall. To avoid this, attackers use vast networks of proxy servers, often consisting of thousands of compromised computers or residential IP addresses.

This proxy network makes the attack look like it is coming from thousands of different, legitimate users from all over the world. The bot rotates through these IP addresses for each login attempt, making it incredibly difficult to distinguish malicious traffic from genuine customer activity based on IP alone.

The attack itself is a stream of automated HTTP requests to the website’s login endpoint. The bot systematically works through the combo list, submitting each username and password pair. For each attempt, the bot analyzes the server’s response to determine if the login was successful or not.

A successful login might trigger a redirect to the user’s dashboard page or return a specific success code. A failure will likely return an error message like “Invalid credentials”. The bot logs all successful hits into a separate file for the attacker to exploit later. This entire process is automated, requiring minimal human intervention once launched.

The Credential Stuffing Lifecycle

To better visualize the process, we can break it down into a clear lifecycle:

• Acquisition: The attacker obtains a large combo list of usernames and passwords from a previous data breach on the dark web.
• Configuration: The attacker configures their automation tool, loading the combo list and a list of proxy IP addresses to mask the attack’s origin.
• Execution: The tool begins sending high volumes of login attempts to the target website, cycling through credentials and IP addresses.
• Validation: The tool analyzes HTTP responses to identify successful logins. All valid accounts are saved for the next stage.
• Monetization: The attacker takes over the validated accounts. They may steal financial information, drain loyalty points, make fraudulent purchases, or sell the account access to other criminals.

Real-World Credential Stuffing Examples

Credential stuffing is not a theoretical threat. It affects businesses across every industry, causing direct financial loss and severe reputational damage. Examining specific scenarios shows how these attacks manifest and the steps required to mitigate them.

Case Study 1: The E-commerce Gift Card Drain

An online retailer specializing in high-end apparel noticed a disturbing trend. Their customer support team was inundated with complaints from loyal customers claiming their gift card balances and loyalty points had vanished overnight. At the same time, their server logs showed a massive spike in login failures, but also a small, steady increase in successful logins from unusual locations.

The investigation revealed a classic credential stuffing attack. Attackers were using a recently leaked combo list from a popular food delivery app. Because many users shared passwords between the two services, the attackers achieved a success rate of around 0.5%, compromising thousands of accounts over a few days.

Once inside an account, an automated script would immediately check for any stored value. If a gift card or loyalty points were present, the script would use them to purchase digital goods that could be easily resold. The entire process, from login to purchase, took less than a second.

To fix this, the retailer implemented a multi-layered defense. They deployed a bot detection solution that could distinguish automated traffic from human users at the login page. They also placed a rate limit on the login API to slow down the attack. Critically, they required users to re-enter their password or complete a two-factor authentication step before they could view or spend their stored balances.

Case Study 2: The B2B Lead Generation Pipeline Pollution

A B2B SaaS company was facing a different kind of problem. Their marketing automation platform showed a huge surge in form submissions for their “Request a Demo” landing page. The marketing team was thrilled, but the sales development representatives were frustrated. The leads were all duds.

The names and email addresses in the forms were real, but when contacted, the people had no idea what the company was or why they had supposedly requested a demo. The attack was polluting their CRM with junk data, wasting the sales team’s time and skewing marketing metrics. The attackers’ goal was not to gain access but to use the form’s response to validate which email addresses on their list were still active.

An “email not found” error told them the email was bad, while a “Thank you for your request” page confirmed it was a valid, active email address. This allowed them to clean their lists for use in more targeted phishing attacks against other companies.

The solution involved fortifying the form itself. They added a modern, user-friendly CAPTCHA that was difficult for bots to solve. They also implemented a “honeypot” field, a hidden form field that is invisible to human users but filled in by most bots. Any submission containing data in the honeypot field was automatically discarded as spam.

Case Study 3: The Publisher’s Premium Content Leak

A financial news publisher operating a subscription-based model discovered their exclusive, high-value research reports were being shared on pirate websites and private forums. This content was their core product, and its widespread availability was causing a noticeable drop in new subscriptions. The value of their paywall was being destroyed.

The source of the leak was traced back to a handful of compromised subscriber accounts. Attackers had used credential stuffing to gain access. Once logged in, they used automated web scrapers to systematically download every article, report, and piece of analysis available to a premium member.

These compromised accounts were then either sold directly or used by the attackers to set up their own distribution channels. A single compromised account could be used to exfiltrate the publisher’s entire library of content, effectively nullifying the value for paying customers.

The publisher fought back by implementing device fingerprinting. Their system began to track the unique devices and locations associated with an account. If an account that normally logged in from one location in New York suddenly had dozens of sessions from different countries, it was flagged for review and locked. They also introduced download velocity limits, preventing a single user from downloading hundreds of reports in a short time frame.

The Financial Impact of Credential Stuffing

The cost of a credential stuffing attack extends far beyond the immediate fraudulent transactions. The financial damage is multifaceted, affecting a business’s revenue, operational budget, and long-term brand value. Understanding these costs is essential for justifying investment in preventative measures.

The most obvious costs are the direct financial losses. This includes refunding customers for fraudulent purchases made with their compromised accounts, replacing stolen funds, and reimbursing drained loyalty points or gift cards. For a large-scale attack, these direct losses can quickly escalate into hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Consider a simple calculation. An attacker launches a campaign with a list of 10 million credentials. Even with a conservative 0.2% success rate, that results in 20,000 compromised accounts. If the average loss per account is just $25 from a fraudulent purchase, the direct financial damage is already $500,000.

Beyond direct fraud, there are significant operational costs. The surge in customer complaints requires more support staff to handle calls and emails, increasing overhead. Security and engineering teams must divert their time from product development to investigate the incident, analyze logs, and patch vulnerabilities, representing a substantial loss of productivity.

The attack also puts a heavy strain on infrastructure. A high-volume credential stuffing attack can generate millions of login requests, consuming massive amounts of bandwidth and server processing power. This can lead to slow performance for legitimate users or even a complete site outage, resulting in lost sales and a poor customer experience.

Finally, the most damaging cost is often the hardest to quantify: reputational harm. When customers learn that their accounts have been compromised, they lose trust in the brand. This leads to customer churn, negative reviews, and difficulty acquiring new customers. A single, well-publicized attack can tarnish a company’s reputation for years, impacting its long-term growth and profitability.

Strategic Nuances and Advanced Defenses

Effectively combating credential stuffing requires moving beyond basic defenses and understanding the myths that often lead to a false sense of security. Adopting a more sophisticated, layered approach is key to staying ahead of attackers.

Myths vs. Reality

A common myth is that a strong password policy makes a website immune. The reality is that your site’s password requirements are irrelevant if a user reuses that same strong password on another website that gets breached. Credential stuffing exploits password reuse, not password weakness.

Another dangerous misconception is viewing a high rate of failed logins as harmless background noise. In reality, a sudden, massive spike in login failures is the single most reliable indicator of an active credential stuffing attack. It is the primary signal that your organization is being targeted and that account takeovers are imminent.

Many people also incorrectly equate credential stuffing with brute-force attacks. A brute-force attack tries many different passwords for a single username. Credential stuffing tries a single, known-to-be-valid password against many different usernames. This makes it far more efficient and less noisy on a per-account basis, helping it evade simple lockout policies.

Advanced Tactics Competitors Miss

To truly secure your platform, you must adopt proactive and intelligent defense mechanisms. One powerful strategy is to check user credentials against known data breach lists in real time. Using a service like the Pwned Passwords API, you can prevent users from signing up or logging in with a password that has already been exposed in a breach, forcing them to choose a unique, secure credential.

Another advanced layer of defense is behavioral analysis. Instead of relying solely on static checks like an IP address, these systems analyze how a user interacts with the login page. They look at mouse movements, typing cadence, and device orientation. Humans behave in unique, chaotic ways, while bots are rigid and programmatic. This allows the system to identify and block automated attacks without adding any friction for legitimate users.

Finally, do not neglect your APIs. Attackers often bypass the main website’s login form and target the underlying APIs used by mobile apps or single-page applications. These endpoints must be protected with the same rigor as your primary user interface, including strict rate limiting, bot detection, and robust authentication protocols. Leaving an API unprotected is like locking the front door but leaving the back window wide open.

Abisola

Meet Abisola! As the content manager at ClickPatrol, she’s the go-to expert on all things fake traffic. From bot clicks to ad fraud, Abisola knows how to spot, stop, and educate others about the sneaky tactics that inflate numbers but don’t bring real results.

View all posts by Abisola (Abisola)