What is Time to Live (TTL)?

Time to Live (TTL) is a value in a Domain Name System (DNS) record that specifies how long a DNS resolver, like your internet service provider, should cache (store) that information. Measured in seconds, this setting dictates when the resolver must request a fresh copy of the record from the authoritative DNS server.

Think of TTL as an expiration date on a piece of data. When you visit a website, your computer needs to find the server’s IP address. It asks a DNS resolver, which then finds the answer and stores it for a specific amount of time, defined by the TTL.

This caching mechanism is fundamental to the internet’s efficiency. Without it, every single request for a website would require a full lookup process, placing an enormous strain on the global DNS infrastructure. TTL ensures that resolvers can answer queries quickly from their local memory.

The concept did not originate with DNS. It was first a mechanism to prevent data packets from circulating endlessly in a computer network. Each time a packet passed through a router, its TTL value was decreased, and if it hit zero, the packet was discarded.

While that use still exists, TTL is now most commonly associated with DNS. It represents a critical balance. A long TTL reduces load on DNS servers and speeds up repeat lookups, but it makes changes to your records slow to take effect. A short TTL allows for quick updates but increases DNS query volume.

The Technical Mechanics of TTL in DNS

Understanding TTL requires looking at the step-by-step process of a DNS query. This journey from domain name to IP address is where TTL plays its most important role. It all starts when a user attempts to access a domain.

First, the user’s device (or ‘stub resolver’) checks its own local cache. If the record is found and the TTL has not expired, the process ends here, and the IP address is used immediately. This is the fastest possible outcome.

If the record isn’t in the local cache, the request goes to a recursive DNS resolver. This is typically managed by an Internet Service Provider (ISP) or a public service like Google’s 8.8.8.8. This resolver is the primary workhorse of the DNS system for end-users.

The recursive resolver checks its own cache. Millions of users share these resolvers, so there is a high chance the record for a popular site is already cached. If it finds a valid, non-expired entry, it returns the IP address to the user, and the journey is over.

This is where the TTL value is enforced. The resolver will not hold the record for longer than the specified number of seconds. Once the timer expires, the cached entry is marked as invalid and must be fetched again on the next request.

If the record is not in the resolver’s cache or has expired, a full lookup begins. The resolver contacts a root nameserver, which knows where to find the top-level domain (TLD) nameservers (like for .com or .org). The root server doesn’t have the IP address, but it points the resolver in the right direction.

Next, the resolver contacts the TLD nameserver. This server doesn’t have the final IP address either. Instead, it directs the resolver to the domain’s authoritative nameservers, which are specified in the domain’s registration records.

Finally, the resolver queries the authoritative nameserver for the domain. This server holds the actual DNS records (A, CNAME, MX, etc.) and is the definitive source of information. It provides the IP address along with the TTL value set by the domain administrator.

The recursive resolver receives this information, caches the record for the duration of the TTL, and sends the IP address back to the user’s device. The user’s device also caches it locally. For the next several hours or days (depending on the TTL), any subsequent requests from that user will be answered instantly from the cache.

Common TTL Values and Their Uses

TTL values are set in seconds and can vary widely. A common default value at many domain registrars is 3600 (1 hour) or 86400 (24 hours). The choice depends entirely on the record’s purpose and how frequently it might change.

• 86400 (24 hours): A high TTL suitable for very stable records that rarely change, like an A record for a long-established corporate website or certain MX records for email.
• 3600 (1 hour): A standard, balanced default. It provides good caching performance without making you wait an entire day for DNS changes to propagate.
• 1800 (30 minutes): A common value for records managed by a Content Delivery Network (CDN) or load balancer, offering a good mix of performance and agility.
• 300 (5 minutes): A low TTL used when preparing for a planned DNS change, like a server migration. This value is often set 24-48 hours before the change.
• 60 (1 minute): A very low TTL used for critical records that may require rapid failover, such as in high-availability setups. This can increase DNS query load.

Three Case Studies of TTL Management

The abstract concept of TTL becomes much clearer when viewed through real-world scenarios. Mismanaging this simple setting can have significant consequences for businesses of all sizes, from lost revenue to brand damage.

Scenario A: The E-commerce Migration Failure

An online retailer, ‘GadgetGo’, planned to migrate its entire website to a new, more powerful server infrastructure a week before its major Black Friday sale. The technical team knew they needed to update their primary A record to point to the new server’s IP address.

What Went Wrong:
To ensure a swift cutover, the team followed a common piece of advice: lower the TTL. They changed the A record’s TTL from its default of 1 hour (3600 seconds) to just 60 seconds. However, they made this change a full three days before the planned migration.

The immediate result was a massive increase in DNS queries. Every resolver on the internet that previously cached the record for an hour now had to re-request it every single minute. This surge in traffic overwhelmed their authoritative DNS provider, leading to slow lookups and intermittent site connection errors for customers globally. The site became sluggish days before the biggest sales event of the year.

How It Was Fixed:
After noticing the performance dip, they realized their mistake. They immediately raised the TTL back to a more moderate 1800 seconds (30 minutes). This stabilized the DNS query load. For the actual migration, they implemented a phased approach: they set the TTL to 300 seconds (5 minutes) just 24 hours before the switch, providing agility without causing a system overload. The final migration went smoothly.

Scenario B: The B2B Lead Generation Outage

A B2B SaaS company, ‘LeadFlow’, was moving its marketing website from one hosting provider to another. The website was critical for generating demo requests. The TTL for their `www` CNAME record was set to the default 24 hours (86400 seconds).

What Went Wrong:
The team scheduled the migration for a Monday morning. They updated the CNAME record to point to the new host and decommissioned the old server. They did not lower the TTL in advance. As a result, any user whose ISP had queried their domain in the last 24 hours had the old IP address cached.

For up to a full day, a significant portion of their traffic, including potential customers from active ad campaigns, was sent to a dead server. The website appeared to be down, trust was eroded, and dozens of high-value leads were lost. The support team was flooded with tickets from confused users.

How It Was Fixed:
There was no immediate fix. The team had to wait for DNS caches around the world to naturally expire. They communicated the issue on social media, but the damage was done. Their new standard operating procedure now mandates that for any planned DNS change, the TTL must be lowered to 300 seconds at least 48 hours beforehand to ensure old entries are purged from caches before the switch occurs.

Scenario C: The Publisher’s Affiliate Link Problem

A popular review blog, ‘TechCritique’, used a custom domain for affiliate link shortening. For example, a link like `reviews.techcritique.com/product-x` would redirect to a long, tagged affiliate URL. To ensure fast performance, the TTL for the `reviews` subdomain was set to 48 hours (172800 seconds).

What Went Wrong:
One of their top affiliate partners suddenly changed the promotional offer and destination URL for a best-selling product. TechCritique needed to update the redirect immediately to point to the new offer. They changed the DNS record, but because of the extremely high TTL, users everywhere were still being sent to the old, now-expired offer page for up to two days.

Every click was wasted, resulting in thousands of dollars in lost commission. The long TTL, intended to improve performance, had created a critical lack of control over their revenue-generating links. They were unable to react to a time-sensitive business need.

How It Was Fixed:
They couldn’t force caches to update. After the 48-hour period, the new link worked for everyone. The long-term fix was strategic. They lowered the TTL for all their redirect subdomains to 15 minutes (900 seconds). This provided enough caching to be performant while giving them the agility to update affiliate offers quickly, preventing future revenue loss.

The Financial Impact of Incorrect TTL

TTL is not just a technical setting; it has a direct and measurable impact on a company’s bottom line. The cost of a misconfiguration can be calculated through downtime, lost opportunities, and performance degradation.

Let’s revisit the B2B SaaS company, ‘LeadFlow’. Assume their website generates an average of 10 qualified leads per day, with each lead having an average lifetime value of $5,000. Their TTL mistake caused an effective outage for roughly 50% of their users for one full day.

The math is straightforward. They lost 50% of 10 leads, which is 5 leads. At $5,000 per lead, the 24-hour TTL mistake cost the company approximately $25,000 in potential future revenue. This calculation does not even include the cost of support staff handling tickets or the intangible damage to their brand’s reputation for reliability.

For the publisher, ‘TechCritique’, the impact was just as direct. If the faulty link received 10,000 clicks over the 2-day period with a 5% conversion rate and a $20 commission per sale, the loss is clear. That’s 500 lost sales at $20 each, totaling $10,000 in lost revenue from a single link because of an inflexible TTL.

Even in the e-commerce scenario, where ‘GadgetGo’ avoided a complete outage, the performance hit matters. Studies consistently show that a 100-millisecond delay in page load time can reduce conversion rates by up to 7%. The DNS slowdown caused by an excessively low TTL could easily introduce that much latency, chipping away at sales during a critical pre-holiday period.

Strategic Nuance and Advanced Tactics

Mastering TTL involves moving beyond the basics and understanding the strategic trade-offs. This means debunking common myths and adopting more sophisticated approaches to DNS management.

Myths vs. Reality

Myth: Set TTL as high as possible for the best performance.
Reality: While a high TTL reduces DNS lookups, it creates extreme inflexibility. As shown in the case studies, this can be disastrous when you need to make a change quickly. The goal is balance, not just raw performance.

Myth: A TTL of 1 second is best for migrations.
Reality: Many recursive resolvers will ignore excessively low TTLs and enforce a minimum caching time of their own (often 30-60 seconds). Setting a TTL too low can also be interpreted as a denial-of-service attack by some DNS providers, leading to rate limiting. A value between 60 and 300 seconds is a safer and more effective choice.

Myth: TTL changes take effect instantly.
Reality: A change to a TTL value only affects new lookups. Anyone who cached the record *before* you changed the TTL will still honor the *old* TTL. This is why you must lower the TTL well in advance of the old value’s duration (e.g., lower it 24 hours before a change if the old TTL was 24 hours).

Advanced Tips

Use Per-Record TTLs: Do not use a single TTL value for your entire DNS zone. A stable A record for your main server can have a TTL of several hours. A CNAME record for a service you are testing or an MX record you plan to migrate soon should have a much shorter TTL.

Plan Migrations with a TTL Ramp-Down: A professional migration plan includes a TTL reduction schedule. For example: 48 hours before the change, lower the TTL from 24 hours to 1 hour. 2 hours before, lower it from 1 hour to 5 minutes. This ensures caches expire globally before you flip the switch.

Understand Your Provider’s Capabilities: Some modern DNS providers and CDNs offer features like near-instant cache purging or intelligent routing that can reduce reliance on low TTLs. Using an Anycast DNS network can also reduce the latency of DNS lookups, making the performance impact of a lower TTL less significant.

Abisola

Meet Abisola! As the content manager at ClickPatrol, she’s the go-to expert on all things fake traffic. From bot clicks to ad fraud, Abisola knows how to spot, stop, and educate others about the sneaky tactics that inflate numbers but don’t bring real results.

View all posts by Abisola (Abisola)