Competitor ad fraud detection: How to protect PPC budgets from rival clicks

Competitor ad fraud detection is no longer optional for advertisers running PPC campaigns on Google Ads and Microsoft Ads.

As competition intensifies and cost-per-click continues to rise, rival advertisers increasingly engage in fraudulent clicking to drain budgets, suppress ad visibility, and distort performance data.

Industry estimates show the scale of the problem is growing rapidly. Global ad fraud losses are projected to reach $172 billion by 2028, with a significant portion of invalid clicks attributed to competitor activity rather than simple bot traffic.

These clicks often come from real devices, shared networks, or VPNs, making them harder to detect and more damaging to campaign learning.

This guide explains how to implement competitor ad fraud detection, recognize competitor-driven click behavior, and protect your PPC budgets by identifying, blocking, and preventing rival clicks before they degrade campaign performance.

What is competitor ad fraud?

This is a situation where competitors of your business may click your ads without any intention of converting.

The process is straightforward: deplete your ad budget daily or monthly until your ads are no longer displayed, and your competitors get more views. Competitors can:

• Click on multiple ads originating from the same IP address or network
• Click on the advertisements at certain times (e.g., early in the day) to exhaust budgets
• Avoid converting to increase wasted spending.
• Use VPNs or shared networks to conceal intentions

Why competitor ad fraud detection matters

Many marketers assume that ad platforms automatically filter invalid clicks.

Even though ad networks like Google Ads can detect invalid click activity, competitor activity may involve gray areas.

And because some of these click activities emanate from genuine users on genuine devices, they might not be flagged.

Failure to implement ad fraud detection against competitors may result in:

• Wasted ad spend: Budgets are consumed without generating revenue
• Less ad visibility: Ads will cease to appear after exhausting budgets
• Misleading performance metrics: Inflated CTR and reduced conversion rates

Common signs of competitor ad fraud

Before setting up any detection technique, it is important to recognize the warning signs.

While no single metric confirms competitor ad fraud, patterns across multiple data points often reveal it.

• Repeated clicks without conversions: If you notice the same users clicking ads multiple times without converting, especially on high-intent keywords, it may indicate competitor activity.
• Unusual click spikes at specific times: A sudden spike in clicks during morning hours or during regular business hours when the competition is active may be a concern.
• High CPC keywords with poor ROI: Often, your strongest keywords are what the competitors are going after. If your high-cost keywords aren’t converting as expected, investigate more.
• Geographic or Network Anomalies: Clicks coming disproportionately from certain locations, ISPs, or IP ranges, particularly where competitors are based, may indicate fraudulent behavior.

A Step-by-step approach to competitor ad fraud detection

Competitor ad fraud detection requires a structured approach that combines data analysis, behavioral monitoring, and proactive prevention to protect ad budgets without disrupting legitimate user traffic.

Step 1: Audit your campaign data

• Click-frequency analysis to identify users generating an unusually high number of clicks.
• Analyze time differences between clicks to identify rapid, repetitive activity.
• Analyze conversion lag to identify clicks that never start working toward meaningful actions.
• Monitor bounce rates and session duration to identify low-quality or non-engaged visits.
• Assess geographic and network data for clusters related to competitor locations.
• Campaign-level audits provide the necessary background for effective detection of competitor ad fraud.

Step 2: Observe IP-Level behavior

• Track IP addresses and subnets interacting with ads over time
• Identify repeat clicks from the same IP with no matching conversions
• Look for patterns across a variety of campaigns or keywords coming from identical networks
• Store past IP history to identify one-off behaviors from intentional abuses
• Automated fraud detection can be done using tools like ClickPatrol, which not only helps track the IP-level behavior but also does it at scale.

Step 3: Set fraud thresholds clearly

• Define acceptable click limits per IP within certain time windows
• Flag traffic that is minimally engaging, such as mere sessions and immediate exits
• Identify multiple clicks from the same source across different keywords or campaigns
• Continuously tune thresholds so as not to block valid research-driven users
• The threshold-based detection improves accuracy by reducing false positives.

Step 4: Proactively block competitor IPs

• Exclude confirmed competitor IPs once the behavioral pattern passes fraud criteria.
• Prevent future clicks from known abusive sources before more money is wasted
• Temporary or permanent exclusions, depending on the confidence level
• Solutions like ClickPatrol automate IP blocking, enabling advertisers to enforce exclusions more effectively.

Step 5: Integrate with Ad platforms

• Ensure that fraud detection measures are integrated with Google Ads and Microsoft Ads.
• Automatically apply IP exclusions, rather than manually updating them.
• Keep exclusion lists current as competitor behavior changes
• Seamless integration ensures competitor ad fraud detection remains effective at scale

Step 6: Continuous improvement and review

• Regularly examine blocked IPs and flagged activity.
• Track changes to CPC, conversion rate, and spend efficiency.
• Adjust thresholds as traffic volumes and competitive pressures change.
• Continuous optimization improves long-term accuracy in detecting competitor ad fraud.

Balancing ad fraud detection with user experience

A major challenge in competitor ad fraud detection is stopping fraudulent activity without blocking legitimate potential customers.

Overly aggressive filters can limit reach, distort performance data, and reduce conversions. A practical approach focuses on identifying intent rather than isolated actions.

This balance is restored through:

• Behavioral patterns over time, in contrast to click or session-level behavior
• Usage of temporary or conditional blocks when there is a lack of clarity around intent
• Employing rule-based or machine learning systems that learn to change as new patterns appear

Measuring the impact of competitor ad fraud detection

When it comes to competitor ad fraud detection, it becomes imperative to monitor its effectiveness to ensure that campaigns are protected and functioning accurately.

Indicators that are worth considering for monitoring its effectiveness include

• Minimized ad spend: Less competition means ad budgets are spent on actual prospects
• Enhanced conversion rates: The traffic becomes more relevant; consequently, the probability of useful interactions increases
• Lower CPC on competitive keywords: The budget/click efficiency increases as malicious clicks are removed.
• More stable daily spend patterns: This makes it easier to retain a constant advertising presence.

Case study: Conservio reducing fraudulent traffic and saving ad spend

Conservio, a nature-positive vacation company, has fully optimized its paid campaigns, which featured an alarmingly high ad spend but a remarkably low conversion rate.

The company’s marketing team believed that non-genuine traffic, including click fraud, was impacting its performance and eating into its budget.

By adopting a fraud detection system (ClickPatrol) on its website, Conservio observed tangible improvements in traffic quality, in addition to cost efficiency:

Non-human traffic was reduced by 14%, indicating that many clicks that were presumably invalid or related to competition were being filtered out.

By removing these unjustified interactions, the firm is estimated to have saved nearly $1,940 in advertising waste from fraudulent clicks.

In the words of the CEO of Conservio, “Cleaner traffic gave us improved ROI and a better insight into the actual performance of our campaigns; this makes the importance of competitor ad fraud detection clear.

Shield your campaigns with competitor ad fraud detection

Competitor ad fraud detection is essential for advertisers who want to protect PPC budgets, preserve clean data, and maintain strong campaign performance.

Without detection, rival clicks quietly inflate costs, corrupt conversion signals, and weaken automated bidding systems.

By combining campaign audits, IP-level analysis, behavioral thresholds, and automated blocking, advertisers can significantly reduce wasted spend and regain control over performance data.

Platforms like ClickPatrol make competitor ad fraud detection actionable by blocking abusive clicks at the source while maintaining reach for genuine prospects.

Take action today. Implement competitor ad fraud detection with ClickPatrol to block rival clicks, protect your PPC budgets, and ensure every click contributes real value to your campaigns.

Abisola

Meet Abisola! As the content manager at ClickPatrol, she’s the go-to expert on all things fake traffic. From bot clicks to ad fraud, Abisola knows how to spot, stop, and educate others about the sneaky tactics that inflate numbers but don’t bring real results.

View all posts by Abisola (Abisola)

Related Articles

8 Ways to detect ad copy scraping in your PPC campaigns in 2026

Ad fraud bots are draining billions: Insights from global industry studies

Bot traffic in PPC 2026: Industry benchmarks, wasted ad spend, and how ClickPatrol stops invalid traffic