Ad fraud and attribution concerns widen trust gap in India’s digital advertising market

Ad fraud and broken attribution are emerging as critical threats to India’s digital advertising market, with marketers reporting growing frustration over unreliable metrics, opaque media buying and inconsistent traffic quality. From our perspective at ClickPatrol, the most serious consequence is not only wasted budget, but a widening trust gap between advertisers, agencies and platforms that makes it harder to scale high intent campaigns confidently.

Ad fraud in India is shifting from volume to sophistication

Indian digital ad spend has expanded rapidly, particularly across mobile and app inventory. As the source article highlights, this growth has been accompanied by an increase in invalid traffic tactics that are harder to spot using basic filters or platform level fraud checks.

Advertisers and agencies are not just fighting obvious bot traffic. They are dealing with more subtle patterns: device farms that mimic human behavior, coordinated click flooding on search campaigns, misrepresented inventory in programmatic buys and fake app installs that never produce meaningful downstream events.

On Google Ads, Meta Ads and Microsoft Ads, this often shows up as campaigns with apparently strong click through rates but weak post click engagement, high bounce rates and erratic conversion paths. Without independent verification of traffic quality, many advertisers end up optimizing toward the very segments that contain the most fraud.

Key findings on fraud, attribution and trust

The industry voices and data points cited in the source piece paint a consistent picture of mounting concern around ad fraud, attribution and transparency in India’s digital ecosystem. Among the most important themes for PPC practitioners:

• Significant waste from invalid activity: Experts quoted in the article describe ad fraud as a material drain on performance budgets, especially in performance oriented channels such as programmatic app campaigns and affiliate media.
• Attribution models under strain: Marketers are questioning last click and multi touch attribution when large portions of traffic may be non human or low intent, leading to misleading channel performance comparisons.
• Fragmented verification: Many advertisers rely solely on native platform tools or occasional audits, which leaves gaps in protection across mobile web, apps and third party networks.
• Trust gap with suppliers: Concerns about undisclosed arbitrage, opaque inventory sourcing and inconsistent reporting are eroding confidence in some publishers, networks and intermediaries.
• Growing demand for independent checks: The article notes a rising interest in third party fraud and measurement solutions as brands seek cleaner data and more defensible ROI claims.

Why attribution breaks when ad fraud is ignored

Attribution only works if the underlying traffic is real and measurable. Once invalid clicks enter the data, every performance metric becomes distorted.

In our work with advertisers in India, we regularly see search and social campaigns where:

• Click and impression volumes rise sharply, but scroll depth, time on site and meaningful actions collapse.
• Retargeting lists and lookalike audiences are polluted with fake or ultra low quality users, making subsequent campaigns more expensive and less effective.
• Channel comparisons become unreliable, for example when display or app inventory appears to drive large post click conversions that later show no repeat engagement or revenue.

When this happens, attribution models start rewarding the wrong channels, placements and audience segments. Budget is reallocated toward sources that are actually driven by fraud or arbitrage, while genuinely effective placements get cut because they look weaker on a flawed report.

How the trust gap affects agencies and brands

The source article underlines a growing trust deficit across the ecosystem. For agencies managing large PPC and programmatic budgets in India, this shows up through tougher questions from clients about where ads actually ran, what share of clicks were genuine and how many conversions were validated against downstream business outcomes.

Brands, especially in sectors like fintech, ecommerce, gaming and D2C, are becoming more skeptical about top line performance claims that are not backed by transparent fraud checks. Many are starting to request:

• Independent verification of traffic quality, beyond platform provided metrics.
• Clear documentation of media buying practices, including use of resellers and intermediaries.
• Regular reporting on invalid click rates, blocked sources and remediation actions.

For agencies, being proactive on ad fraud and attribution is no longer optional. It is increasingly a condition for winning and retaining performance accounts.

Practical implications for PPC budgets in India

For practitioners, the issue is not theoretical. Invalid clicks translate directly into higher cost per acquisition, inflated cost per lead and misleading return on ad spend figures. Some of the most common patterns we see across Indian Google Ads, Meta Ads and Microsoft Ads accounts include:

• Search and Performance Max campaigns hit by repeated clicks from the same devices or IP ranges, driving up CPCs without adding incremental conversions.
• Mobile app install campaigns that generate high volume but with almost no in app actions, pointing to incentivized or fake installs.
• Affiliate or network traffic that looks strong in upper funnel metrics but fails to produce high value events such as purchases, deposits or subscriptions.

When these issues are left unchecked, advertisers end up paying for the same non converting devices over and over. Budgets that could support profitable incremental reach are instead absorbed by a narrow cluster of low value or fraudulent sources.

Strengthening traffic quality and attribution with ClickPatrol

From ClickPatrol’s perspective, the way to reduce the trust gap is to combine better detection with operational changes in how campaigns are managed.

Our systems monitor each click across Google Ads, Meta Ads and Microsoft Ads using multiple behavioral and technical signals, such as repetition patterns, device and IP anomalies, click timing, on site activity and conversion outcomes. When we detect fake, bot or abusive clicks, we automatically block those sources in real time so they cannot keep draining your budgets.

The result for advertisers is:

• Cleaner data: Analytics and attribution models are built on real user interactions instead of inflated click counts.
• More accurate optimization: Bidding, budgets and audience strategies are updated based on trustworthy conversion paths, not noise from invalid traffic.
• Higher ROI: Spend is shifted away from wasteful placements and into campaigns and segments that drive genuine business impact.

For agencies operating in India, using a dedicated click fraud protection layer also provides a tangible proof point in client conversations. You can show how many fraudulent clicks were blocked, from which geos or devices, and how that translated into more effective spend.

Steps advertisers in India can take now

To respond to the concerns highlighted in the original reporting on ad fraud, attribution and trust in India, we recommend a set of immediate, practical actions for PPC teams:

• Audit recent campaign traffic for unusual spikes, repeated clicks and placements with high CTR but no meaningful engagement.
• Segment performance reports by device, publisher and geo to identify pockets of suspicious traffic quality.
• Align attribution with business outcomes: validate reported conversions against CRM, revenue or in app events.
• Use independent fraud and click protection tools, such as ClickPatrol, alongside built in platform filters.
• Review contracts and reporting expectations with agencies, networks and affiliates to include explicit traffic quality and invalid click metrics.

As India’s digital advertising market matures, those who treat traffic quality as a first class metric will be better positioned to defend their budgets, defend their numbers and scale the campaigns that genuinely perform.

Advertisers and agencies that want to close the trust gap and protect their PPC investment can start a free trial of ClickPatrol or speak with our team to see how automatic blocking and richer traffic insights can clean up their campaigns.

Abisola

Meet Abisola! As the content manager at ClickPatrol, she’s the go-to expert on all things fake traffic. From bot clicks to ad fraud, Abisola knows how to spot, stop, and educate others about the sneaky tactics that inflate numbers but don’t bring real results.

View all posts by Abisola (Abisola)

Related Articles

Ad Fraud Detection Tools Market Accelerates As Digital Advertising Risks Climb

How PPC Advertisers Can Kill Click Fraud for Good by 2026

How PPC Advertisers Can Kill Click Fraud for Good by 2026