Yes, you will lose a bit of impression volume. But offset by improved CTR, improved conversion rates, and reduced waste.
The overall impact is a higher ROI and cleaner data, which is more valuable than unfiltered volume.
Low-quality ad sites: How they drain CTRs and how ClickPatrol restores ad performance
Abisola Tanzako | Oct 30, 2025
 
Table of Contents
- What are low-quality ad sites (MFA), and why they affect CTRs
- The problem: Ads in low-quality ad sites
- CTR drops explained: The impact of low-quality ad sites
- How low-quality ad sites affect campaigns
- Wasted budgets:
- Reputation damage:
- Skewed analytics:
- Compliance and legal exposure:
- Inventory squeeze on premier sites:
- How ClickPatrol detects and blocks low-quality ad site challenges
- 5 Best practices to avoid low-quality ad sites and protect CTRs
- Protect your digital campaigns: The hidden dangers of low-quality ad placements and how to stop them
Low-quality ad sites filled with thin content, excessive advertising, or even outright fraud drain budgets and hurt campaign performance.
These made-for-advertising (MFA) sites prioritize auto-generated content over user value, exposing advertisers to major brand safety risks.
However, the danger extends beyond a wasted budget. Suspicious domains with 100% click-through rates or absurdly high CTRs are red flags of bot-driven fraud, not real engagement.
Benchmarks indicate a 15% decline in CTR within the first week on these low-quality sites, primarily due to ad fatigue and the targeting of irrelevant audiences.
In this article, we will break down what low-quality sites are, how they affect ad performance, and how ClickPatrol’s advanced exclusion tool can help you recover your budget and keep your placements safe.
What are low-quality ad sites (MFA), and why they affect CTRs
Low-quality ad sites, also known as made-for-advertising or MFA sites, are websites created primarily to generate ad revenue without providing substantial content or value.
Such platforms usually have:
- Thin or duplicate content: Scraped pages, having little original value.
- Poor user experience: Pop-ups, slow loading, and intrusive formats that scare away visitors.
- Invalid traffic: Fake impressions and clicks caused by bots and an artificial increase in metrics.
The problem: Ads in low-quality ad sites
It is one thing to bid on quality inventory, and the next thing is to have your ad placed between fake reviews on a website no one has ever heard of.
In open auctions, algorithms tend to favor low-cost impressions, directing ads to the lowest-cost slots, which can be associated with low-quality ad sites.
The most significant concerns are:
Irrelevant audiences:
Users (or bots) on these sites often do not align with your target demographic, resulting in inappropriate messaging.
Brand safety risks:
Trust is compromised due to proximity to unsafe content. A 2019 study commissioned by Integral Ad Science through Statista found that 62% of U.S. consumers would stop purchasing from brands whose ads are displayed in low-quality settings.
Invalid traffic (IVT):
According to Forbes, high IVT rates are associated with poor placements, as clicks do not convert to commissions due to automation.
CTR drops explained: The impact of low-quality ad sites
CTRs are used to estimate the proportion of ad impressions that result in clicks, serving as a measure of ad relevance and attractiveness.
However, this metric is misleading due to low-quality ad sites, which lead to decreases in three ways:
Inflated but fake metrics
Websites receiving bot traffic have high CTRs at the start- Forbes mentions 100% CTRs as a warning of a scam.
These quality clicks (those who do not bounce at first) crater as soon as the real users are faced with the ad in a suspicious situation.
Analysis shows that moving spend to long-tail sites with improved CTRs is not a good strategy, as bots increase invalid traffic but yield no conversions.
Ad fatigue and ad avoidance
Banner blindness occurs more rapidly on cluttered, low-trust sites. CTRs may decrease by more than 15% during the first week of exposure on poor placements due to fatigue.
18% of consumers in the U.S. consider ads placed on ad-supported websites to be often irrelevant and thus less engaging.
Lower quality scores and increased costs
Google and other platforms penalize poor performance by reducing the Quality Score, which in turn increases the price per click (CPC).
Ads on low-quality ad sites create a vicious cycle, as placing an ad on poor inventory becomes more expensive, resulting in less money to purchase good inventory, which in turn leads to lower rates.
How low-quality ad sites affect campaigns
Outside of CTRs, such sites exacerbate issues:
Wasted budgets:
Every amount on a low-quality ad site is an opportunity wasted, as ad fraud claims 22% of digital spend in 2023.
Reputation damage:
According to Statista, 55% of consumers in the UK are now less inclined to brands that advertise around poor-quality content.
Skewed analytics:
Fraudulent clicks distort vanity metrics, misdirected optimizations.
Compliance and legal exposure:
Ads on fake websites may violate GDPR, CCPA, or MRC regulations, resulting in penalties.
According to Forbes, there is increasing regulatory scrutiny, and non-compliant campaigns incur fines of up to 4% of worldwide revenue.
Inventory squeeze on premier sites:
Allocation of budgets to low-quality ad placements pushes out high-value placements.
According to Statista, premium inventory has decreased by 30% due to fraud competition, which has led to a 25% increase in CPMs for genuine publishers.
How ClickPatrol detects and blocks low-quality ad site challenges
ClickPatrol monitors your ad ecosystem in real-time, filtering out low-quality and irrelevant sites so your budget is spent only on trusted, high-performing placements.
Key features:
- Exclusion: ClickPatrol uses AI to identify MFA sites, fraud zones, and irrelevant placements based on traffic sources, content quality, and performance.
- Placement transparency: Get clear reports showing exactly where your ads appear and take action instantly.
- CTR optimization: By prioritizing high-trust domains, clients have seen a 25–40% increase in CTR and a decrease in invalid traffic to less than 5%. For example, Avis, a multinational car rental company, reduced unrelated ad traffic and achieved a 91% increase in CTR by automating traffic screening with ClickPatrol.
5 Best practices to avoid low-quality ad sites and protect CTRs
Although ClickPatrol does the heavy lifting, arm yourself with the following 5 tips to combat the low-quality ad sites:
- Demand placement reports: Demand granular agency data, as Forbes advises, to audit and block bad sites.
- Set viewability thresholds: Set a threshold of 70% or more viewable impressions to eliminate junk placements.
- Take advantage of contextual targeting: Match ads with high-quality content categories with the right audiences.
- Monitor IVT rates: Clean up invalid traffic to less than 10% with tools such as ClickPatrol.
- A/B Test placements: Compare the CTRs of whitelist and open auctions to maximize spend.
Protect your digital campaigns: The hidden dangers of low-quality ad placements and how to stop them
Low-quality ad placements are the silent assassins of digital campaigns, crashing CTRs with fraud, irrelevance, and a lack of trust.
It is impossible to ignore them, as billions are being lost every year, and ad fraud alone is estimated to be $88 billion.
ClickPatrol is not just another ad tech tool; it is your ad guardian. With easy integration, real-time fraud detection, and scalable pricing, it helps businesses reclaim wasted spend and maximize ROI.
Frequently Asked Questions
- 
                Will removing many placements reduce my scale and raise CPMs?
- 
                How does ClickPatrol do better than a blocklist?ClickPatrol outperforms static blocklists by scoring placements at the URL level, assessing viewability, traffic legitimacy, ad density, and supply-path transparency. This dynamic process identifies new low-quality placements more quickly and maintains scale by selectively blocking only the problematic pieces, rather than entire domains. 
 
             
                             
                             
